- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:10:52 +0100
- To: public-earl10-comments@w3.org
This is feedback on a Last Call Working Draft: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema W3C Working Draft 10 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/ Especially on ยง 2.6. TestMode Class: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/#TestMode Given that there are instances of earl:OutcomeValue, why are there no values of earl:TestMode? The latter class has a similar enumeration of subclasses to earl:OutcomeValue, and yet earl:OutcomeValue has (default?) instances for those subclasses and earl:TestMode does not. Compare also Bug 018, where it is proposed that the instances of earl:OutcomeValue be removed. This bug argues that if the instances of earl:OutcomeValue are retained, then there should be similar instances for the subclasses of earl:TestMode. If there are arguments against them, on the other hand, it should be investigated whether those arguments also apply to the instances of earl:OutcomeValue. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 16:11:21 UTC