- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:38:40 +0100
- To: public-earl10-comments@w3.org
This is feedback on a Last Call Working Draft: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema W3C Working Draft 10 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/ Bug 018 proposes removing the earl:OutcomeValue instances and replacing earl:TestResult with earl:OutcomeValue. If this approach be found undesirable, however, it may be convenient to use constrained literal values instead. So in other words the following example taken from Bug 018: :assertion earl:result [ a earl:TestResult; dct:date "..."; # required for no obvious reason earl:outcome earl:passed; earl:info "passed for the first time" ]. # not clear if this is a valid use of earl:info, compare Bug 011 Would become in this proposal: :assertion earl:result [ a earl:TestResult; earl:outcome "passed"; earl:info "passed for the first time" ]. This would have the effect that Bug 019 would disappear as an issue, since it would not be feasible in RDF/XML to give literals as subjects for annotation with dct:title and dct:description. -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 13:39:07 UTC