- From: Clement Jonquet via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:28:10 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Hello all, I never realized part of our discussion in FAIR-IMPACT was moved here. Sorry. Just to keep the pointer:https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD/discussions/34 This is the discussion we are talking about. IMO we can see a mod:SemanticArtefact explicitly as a dcat:DataSet (indeed as a dataset of terms which does not mean that everything is a dataset too...). I think this is the case not that much because an ontology match the defintion of "collection of data" but mostly because MOD adheres to the general principle and philosophy of DCAT which is to describe datasets (as a broader term) that can be catalogued and served and distributed. To me this is want to do for SA and then adopting DCAT give the path, and we should not get stuck on the way with the restrictive description as it is of dcat:Dataset. If DCAT enable dcat:Distribution for resource and not dcat:Dataset, to me this will create more confusion than benefits. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jonquet Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-2191237605 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2024 09:28:10 UTC