- From: Bert Van Nuffelen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:36:18 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
As a reflection, the WG should consider if dcat:Resource has a semantical meaning or if it just an alternative for rdfs:Resource. I always have read dcat:Resource as a Catalogued Resource, i.e. a resource that is in the catalogue and which is actively managed by the catalogue. By making a Distribution a dcat:Resource subclass, it becomes a directly managed entity. Thus a catalogue of Distributions is fine. Then also dcat:distribution gets maybe a different semantics as dcat:dataset is a subproperty of dcat:resource and thus for coherency reasons also dcat:distribution must be a subproperty of dcat:resource. But then all datasets become catalogues... as dcat:resource has as domain dcat:Catalog. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bertvannuffelen Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-2082064927 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 29 April 2024 07:36:19 UTC