- From: María via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 13:34:48 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Sorry for arriving quite late. I also see unnatural to classify ontologies as Dataset (see the difference with classifiying skos vocabularies as datasets which looks fine), an ontology contains definitions rather than a set of data or facts. The point is that for OWL ontologies, for example, would be needed to have distributions but at Resource level or a level sibling to Dataset. It happens that the differences between Resource and Dataset are not so clear (e.g. too general definitions opening the door to "other..." and the EU list of resources) and seems that the term Dataset is being used for duplicate the Resource concept to keep it general as "it was not intended to be used directly". -- GitHub Notification of comment by mariapoveda Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-1708378319 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2023 13:34:51 UTC