Re: [dxwg] adms references (#1570)

This is good news.

We've been using adms as a placeholder so now we firm up its use.

Perhaps a specific profile of adms aligned to prov would be good to define

Ogc will register the profile we use if we adopt it as a policy.



On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, 03:20 Bert Van Nuffelen via GitHub, <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> @riccardoAlbertoni
> It is explained in this webinar
> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/semic-support-centre/event/first-webinar-adms
> .
> But in short, the future is
> -  a joined collaboration between the SEMIC team and W3C for this
> vocabulary
> -  no major changes are to be expected in the near future as the
> objectives are
>       - to fresh up the specification ADMS to become a living
> specification with a community to address issues to
>       - reduce the strong ties between ADMS and DCAT, so that ADMS terms
> can be used independently (current practice already, but that use was not
> according to the specification intentions.)
>
> Unless the community raises new use-cases I expect that this version will
> be stable for a long period.
>
>
>
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by bertvannuffelen
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1570#issuecomment-1576194199 using
> your GitHub account
>
>
> --
> Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in
> https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
>
>

-- 

Sign up for OGC News 
<https://ogc.us4.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=704e02f81107a6caab1568067&id=4e4528fd9d>