- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:22:30 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I am wondering why you think that semantic resources like ontologies and vocabularies cannot be described as `dcat:Dataset`. I have actually recently created a application profile for reference data assets, things like code lists, taxonomies and SKOS concept schemes, and had no problem using DCAT for that. Obviously, some of the properties defined for `dcat:Dataset` may not be relevant for all types of dataset, but you're not obliged to use them if they make no sense for your collection. My worry of widening the domain to `dcat:Resource` is that that class is basically semantically empty, or were you planning to create a new class for semantic resources? If the latter, maybe you could look at ADMS? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1576#issuecomment-1643828500 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2023 12:22:32 UTC