Re: [dxwg] Questions following TAG review (#1530)

Wouldn't lists of lists handle the hierarchy aspect?

On Tue, 13 Sept 2022 at 13:37, Riccardo Albertoni ***@***.***>
wrote:

> Sorry for the late reply.
> As for the prioritization made in DCAT, we have integrated into the
> explainer as requested. Please see updated explainer
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/blob/gh-pages/docs/explainer.md>.
>
> We didn't reuse the rdfs:first and the rdfs:List because DCAT dataset
> series might be hierarchical, i.e. they are not necessary lists.
> Hierarchical dataset series are common in specific domains, for example,
> the geographical domain for remote sensing data.
>
> Considering that DCAT is widely profiled, as a rule of thumb, we try not
> to restrict properties and classes unless we have precise reasons and use
> cases imposing a specific restrictive interpretation. In our view, that
> strategy should pay off in the long term, making DCAT minimal, but
> impacting common for interoperability.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1530#issuecomment-1245352462>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGPQC2OP23DCVEUXJO3V6BYQ3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQBO4BCQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
> ID: ***@***.***>
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by danbri
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1530#issuecomment-1245369983 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2022 12:52:22 UTC