- From: Thomas Francart via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:30:26 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
For the moment we have simply differed the answer and we have actually referred to this very issue; here is how the XKOS best practices document now reads: > These versions containing the history of all notes are considered as different distributions of the datasets. They should be described by specific properties. Here we use rdfs:comment for describing and discriminating the distributions, given a lack of other modeling alternatives in DCAT (as of september 2022; this was raised in [this DCAT issue](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1527#issuecomment-1216353011)). Other information is given by the dcterms:temporal metadata that has a larger span for the distributions containing all the note changes. So, no I don't think the issue should be closed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tfrancart Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1527#issuecomment-1315886836 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2022 21:30:28 UTC