Re: [dxwg] Example 60, 61, 62, why is accessURL included (#1437)

I don't see that use case of determining whether the accessURL is a landing page or a download or something else as a realistic one. If I were writing an app that needed one or the other, I would read just the one relevant field that I'm looking for, e.g., downloadURL. I'm thinking it would behoove us to see what others outside this group think. We see [DCAT-AP using it in the way I had expected](https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/release/how-use-accessurl-and-downloadurl). Are there other users doing the opposite? I still think we should be clarifying rather than altering vocabulary that others are relying on.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1437#issuecomment-1022473673 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2022 18:26:45 UTC