- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:20:23 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> should we continue the discussion in #1442? one of the arguments was that we shouldn't use 'version' to define 'version', and that's why 'revision' was seen as an alternative - I agree we would probably need further clarification @agbeltran see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1442#issuecomment-1033158236 Does it sound convincing to you? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1451#issuecomment-1033159560 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2022 23:20:25 UTC