- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 17:29:46 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> @riccardoAlbertoni , I suggest we discuss this change in the next DCAT meeting before merging. > > I see a number of issues if we replace "version" with "revision": > > 1. If the problem is what "version" means, then we need also to define what a revision is. > 2. If we use "revision", then it's a bit odd to call the property dcat:version > 3. The two points above apply also to all the other properties related to versioning. > > About the original issue (i.e., support to both text and numbers), I suggest we revise the definition as per what said in the usage note: > > > The version indicator (name or identifier) of a resource. I agree. @kcoyle, @agreiner: Are you ok with this phrasing? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1451#issuecomment-1030199225 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 4 February 2022 17:29:48 UTC