- From: Amy Guy via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:01:32 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
rhiaro has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Questions following TAG review == Hello! @hadleybeeman and I left some [questions following our TAG review](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/758#issuecomment-1195215972) last month, but only just realised this week you had indicated you prefer our feedback as an issue on your repo, so you might not have seen it. Apologies for that. Here it is again: It would be really helpful for us if the explainer could go into a bit of detail about the "more pressing use cases and requests among those left unaddressed in the previous standardization round" that version 3 is addressing. It would help us to understand if/how you've accomplished what you set out to do with DCAT 3.0. We also try to join up work across working groups and W3C specs. We see that you've created new terms (such as dcat:first, dcat:prev and dcat:last) which could instead be covered by something like [RDF lists](https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab) — could you tell us why you made that choice? Are there any other opportunities to reuse existing work in DCAT 3.0? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1530 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2022 15:01:34 UTC