- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 08:56:28 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks @sabinem , very good points. I have seen at least three national implementations of data catalogues that take this approach with different files in temporal and/or spatial series as distributions of one dataset. What does worry me is that it makes it hard for reusers -- who harvest or otherwise receive DCAT descriptions -- to understand what's going on if there are some dataset/distribution combinations that follow the recommended pattern of 'distributions contain the same data' and some that follow what is now the anti-pattern. Would it be sensible to distinguish the pattern by using different classes? E.g.: - for the pattern, use `dcat:Dataset` and `dcat:Distribution` - for the alternative use new classes `dcat:Series` and `dcat:SeriesItem`, each with their own sets of properties That way, it would be immediately obvious what pattern is being used. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1429#issuecomment-975294525 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 22 November 2021 08:56:30 UTC