Re: [dxwg] Semantics of the dcat:bbox attribute could (should?) be more explicit (#1392)

@JoepvanGenuchten , @bertvannuffelen ,

The following point:

> 1. Improve the definition of `dcat:bbox` & `dcat:centroid`: @JoepvanGenuchten , @bertvannuffelen , thanks for highlighting the ambiguity of the term "resource" in the current definition of these properties. We'll discuss this issue in one of the next DCAT meetings.

has been addressed via PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1423 (now merged in the ED). If you have concerns on the adopted solution, please open a new issue.

Moreover, a new issue (https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1425) has been created for further discussion on the following point : 

> 2. Re-use reference vocabularies for use cases where DCAT spatial properties are not enough: The new version of GeoSPARQL can do the job, also because it addresses those gaps that led to the definition of spatial properties in the DCAT namespace. 
>
> About point (2), there's of course the issue of having two alternative ways to specify the same information, which does not help interoperability. However, this might be mitigated by defining mappings, as explained by @dr-shorthair .



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1392#issuecomment-966588312 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2021 20:04:48 UTC