- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 07:31:16 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree with @rob-metalinkage that adding specificity to the 'general' property `conformsTo `is the role of a profile. For example, the European DCAT-AP adds details: for Dataset, it refers to "_an implementing rule or other **specification**_" while for Distribution, it specifies "_an established **schema**_". Both fit in the general semantics of `conformsTo`. But if for some reason, an application would find this still too vague -- maybe because a stronger need for validation -- the profile could create subclasses of `conformsTo`, e.g. `conformsToSpec` and `conformsToSchema`. Maybe then this group could investigate whether there is a set of 'common' subproperties of `conformsTo `for the description of datasets that could be added to DCAT? -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1418#issuecomment-957165091 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2021 07:31:18 UTC