- From: Dan Brickley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:24:53 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Perhaps we agree. Putting a rough wine in a fancy bottle in a posh wine cellar doesn’t make it better wine. It may make it more expensive, so long as nobody tries drinking it. The “Agent” type is no better defined in either of its formulations - it’s a hack that serves a pragmatic purpose. On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 09:18, makxdekkers ***@***.***> wrote: > @danbri <https://github.com/danbri> There are certainly environments > where quality of curation of semantics -- e.g. under responsibility of a > trustworthy organisation with a clearly documented and transparent > maintenance process -- is one of the key decision points. > > But I don't think that was the issue here. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1367#issuecomment-845755867>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGMEDLHNRJGXU6DM4STTOYJOVANCNFSM45FZRSWA> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by danbri Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1367#issuecomment-845770008 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 May 2021 08:24:55 UTC