W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2021

Re: [dxwg] Replace FOAF terms - Agent (#1367)

From: Dan Brickley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:24:53 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-845770008-1621585491-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Perhaps we agree. Putting a rough wine in a fancy bottle in a posh wine
cellar doesn’t make it better wine. It may make it more expensive, so long
as nobody tries drinking it. The “Agent” type is no better defined in
either of its formulations - it’s a hack that serves a pragmatic purpose.

On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 09:18, makxdekkers ***@***.***> wrote:

> @danbri <https://github.com/danbri> There are certainly environments
> where quality of curation of semantics -- e.g. under responsibility of a
> trustworthy organisation with a clearly documented and transparent
> maintenance process -- is one of the key decision points.
> But I don't think that was the issue here.
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1367#issuecomment-845755867>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGMEDLHNRJGXU6DM4STTOYJOVANCNFSM45FZRSWA>
> .

GitHub Notification of comment by danbri
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1367#issuecomment-845770008 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 May 2021 08:24:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:37 UTC