- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:44:13 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
We discussed this issue last DCAT call see https://www.w3.org/2021/06/09-dxwgdcat-minutes#t06, Personally, I agree with keeping the sub-property between `dcat:keyword` and `dcterms:subject` as it seems `dctems:subject` now accepts literals, it is an RDF property, it is not defined as `owl:objectProperty`, ... . Other members do not read in the definition of `dcterms:subject` the possibility to use literals. They read "a literal value that identifies the subject" as a literal embedded in a blank node having the actual lexical representation of the subject as an rdfs:label". I guess that more views on whether we can use `dcterms:subject` with literals can help in making a decision. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/175#issuecomment-861659540 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2021 16:44:34 UTC