Sunday, 28 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Fix range of locn:geometry (#1303)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix issue 1293 in rdf
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
Saturday, 27 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
Friday, 26 February 2021
Thursday, 25 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Relate to the Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile (#244)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
Wednesday, 24 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305)
- Closed: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71)
- Closed: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225)
Tuesday, 23 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry
- Re: [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293)
- Found my list
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288)
- Closed: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
Monday, 22 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: DCAT meeting : 23 Feb 2021
- DCAT meeting : 23 Feb 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- Re: [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
Sunday, 21 February 2021
Saturday, 20 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288)
Friday, 19 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to Dublin Core Application Profile framework (#736)
- Re: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460)
- Re: [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace for profiles ontology (and other things?) (#503)
- Re: [dxwg] Invalid Turtle in Example 3 of "The Profiles Vocabulary" (#1302)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
Thursday, 18 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
Wednesday, 17 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- [dxwg] Invalid Turtle in Example 3 of "The Profiles Vocabulary" (#1302)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- [dxwg] Resource URLs prohibit the use of QSA in data aggregators and/or single page web applications (#1301)
- [dxwg] Example 10 contains flawed Turtle (#1300)
- [dxwg] URIs in figure 2 could be turned into links to increase clarity (#1299)
- [dxwg] Example 5 uses no angle brackets in Content-Profile (#1298)
- [dxwg] Example 4 indicates JSON should be expected, but HTML is provided (#1297)
- [dxwg] Introduction repeats possible alternative implementations (#1296)
Tuesday, 16 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 17 Feb 2021 21:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
Sunday, 14 February 2021
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revision to the versioning section
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
Saturday, 13 February 2021
Friday, 12 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
- [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294)
Wednesday, 10 February 2021
Tuesday, 9 February 2021
Monday, 8 February 2021
Saturday, 6 February 2021
Friday, 5 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
Thursday, 4 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT for particular Resources/CKAN catalog (#1286)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT for particular Resources/CKAN catalog (#1286)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
- [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for health dataset that are not directly accessible (#1291)
Wednesday, 3 February 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)
- Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87)
- dxwg-ACTION-438: Prepare a new version of the versioning section
- Re: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 03 Feb 2021 21:00 UTC
- [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290)