- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:57:51 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
In terms of principle, I agree on specializing the range of dcat:byteSize. It makes `dcat:byteSize` semantics more consistent, and consequently, it improves the overall metadata quality. However, this change might have some practical burden on existing implementations. If we restrict the range of `dcat:byteSize`, we force people to correct the metadata in which real numbers or abbreviations are used. I wonder how impacting this change is for people managing tons of metadata. Probably, @simon or @andrea have already considered this aspect. Do we think the advantages in terms of gained quality balance the extra work required to metadata managers? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/125#issuecomment-811857000 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 11:57:53 UTC