Re: [dxwg] Possible relevance of FRBR for versioning (#1251)

@andrea-perego You might have seen that in FRBR none of these are called "versions" - they are relationships between different "things" in that bibliographic universe. I think that the term "version" is quite vague and easily misunderstood. Perhaps the best exercise would be to look at the kinds of relationships that exist in the areas where DCAT is used, and from those form a (informal) taxonomy of those relationships, rather than beginning with a less well shared notion of "version". You may actually discover relationships that are more varied than the more naive sense of "version."

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1251#issuecomment-696753451 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2020 14:20:02 UTC