- From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:00:18 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Although not directly useful, perhaps, to this issue, I have been working on a number of uses of FRBR that are outside of the library context. There is a very short intro to this in my [blog post](http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2019/01/frbr-without-fr-or-br.html). I could look at the DCAT use with that eye, which means extrapolating the semantics of WEMI but super-classed to the library semantics, and possibly sub-classed to a more general set of classes that represent created information. There are some interesting examples of uses of subclasses of FRBR/WEMI which may be relevant as models. I haven't yet thought about whether datasets fit within the library definitions of FRBR or not. That would be step 1. My main question for the table in your file is whether the versions are of the datasets, the metadata, or both. ? Thanks. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1251#issuecomment-694331876 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 17 September 2020 16:00:24 UTC