Re: [dxwg] Issue with dct:hasPart as described in DCAT (#1205)

@dr-shorthair said:

> I agree that in the documentation of `dcterms:hasPart` we should make it clear which scope notes apply in which specific context. As mentioned in `hasPart` can be used in other places, for example for a multi-part dataset.
> So we should tweak the documentation here:
> But I don't think there are any axioms that are harmful.

I concur. However, I think we should drop the indication of the domain in the spec, to avoid any misunderstanding.

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Sunday, 25 October 2020 00:38:00 UTC