Friday, 30 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
Thursday, 29 October 2020
- Closed: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- [dxwg] Revisiting use cases for spatial resolution (#1266)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case that explains the meta modelling requirement for domain/range restrictions on the dcat:contactPoint & other DCAT properties (#130)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Follow-up on DCAT from D3
- Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Follow-up on DCAT from D3
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updating Dave's affiliation
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Updating Dave's affiliation
- Re: Report from last DCAT meeting - plan for FPWD
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: This PR is to review and accept the Danish translation of DCAT
- [dxwg] Pull Request: This PR is to review and accept the Danish translation of DCAT
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for dataset series (#806)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for dataset series (#806)
- [dxwg] Add support for spatial resolution specification via skos:ConceptScheme (#1263)
- Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87)
- Re: [dxwg] Publication source [RPS] (#78)
Wednesday, 28 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF] (#76)
- Re: [dxwg] Metadata guidance rules [RMDG] (#69)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset aspects [RDSAT] (#60)
- Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71)
- Re: [dxwg] Publication control [RPC] (#70)
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources (#238)
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: interoperability between metadata standards describing resources of various types (#223)
- Closed: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Tracking the API bug (mismatch between /TR and API for "vocab-dcat") (#1223)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of dct:type with both Class and Concept (#314)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Stability of DCAT version URIs (#1128)
- Re: [dxwg] versioning and resource status (#1238)
- Closed: [dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
- Re: [dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Closed: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- ISSUE-1: Https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1260
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add draft section for dataset series
Tuesday, 27 October 2020
Monday, 26 October 2020
- DCAT sub-group call 2020.10.28 - 21:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with dct:hasPart as described in DCAT (#1205)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples for dataset series (#806)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
Sunday, 25 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
- Re: [dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add draft section for dataset series
- Re: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- Re: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- Re: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replace https: with http: in IANA URIs
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replace https: with http: in IANA URIs
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with dct:hasPart as described in DCAT (#1205)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove domain indication in dct:hasPart
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove domain indication in dct:hasPart
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with dct:hasPart as described in DCAT (#1205)
Friday, 23 October 2020
Wednesday, 21 October 2020
Monday, 19 October 2020
Friday, 16 October 2020
Thursday, 15 October 2020
- RE: Report from last DCAT meeting - plan for FPWD
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-433: Drop non-relevant issues from fpwd milestone
- Report from last DCAT meeting - plan for FPWD
Wednesday, 14 October 2020
- dxwg-ACTION-434: See how the mapping of un/qualified relationships can be addressed in the current spec
- dxwg-ACTION-433: Drop non-relevant issues from fpwd milestone
- dxwg-ACTION-432: Include feedback as issues in the dcat spec
- Closed: [dxwg] Examples of a manifest for DCAT2 (#1243)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by andrea-perego
Tuesday, 13 October 2020
Monday, 12 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat changing example using dct relation (#1244)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] mediaType a subPropertyOf encodingFormat (#1239)
- DCAT sub-group call 2020.10.14 - 21:00 UTC
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
Friday, 9 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Changing title and adding a new section for tracking changes since latest DCAT 2 rec (#1259)
- Re: [dxwg] Changing title and adding a new section for tracking changes since latest DCAT 2 rec (#1259)
- Re: [dxwg] Changing title and adding a new section for tracking changes since latest DCAT 2 rec (#1259)
Wednesday, 7 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1257)
- RE: [FDC-External]: Re: DCWG Plenary: 2020-10-06
Tuesday, 6 October 2020
Monday, 5 October 2020
Friday, 2 October 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Possible relevance of FRBR for versioning (#1251)
- Re: [dxwg] Possible relevance of FRBR for versioning (#1251)