W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > November 2020

[minutes] DCAT 20201117 (draft)

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:00:39 -0500
To: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <38e8ed6d-22e1-bc3a-3692-8be9672a5de4@w3.org>

             Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference

17 November 2020

   [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.11.17
      [3] https://www.w3.org/2020/11/17-dxwg-irc


          AndreaPerego, plh_, Rachel, RiccardoAlbertoni

          annette, antoine




    1. [4]Patent Policy
    2. [5]FPWD for DCAT
    3. [6]outstanding actions
    4. [7]Summary of resolutions

Meeting minutes

   <Rachel> Hello present+

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes



   <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

   <Rachel> +1

   <AndreaPerego> +1

   Resolution: approve last meeting minutes [9]https://www.w3.org/

      [9] https://www.w3.org/2020/11/03-dxwg-minute

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> [10]https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/

     [10] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.11.17

  Patent Policy

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> [11]https://www.w3.org/Consortium/

     [11] https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20200915/

   Riccardo: Decision on whether or not to adopt the new patent
   policy as discussed in the last plenary ( [12]https://
   www.w3.org/2020/11/03-dxwg-minutes )
   … [ summarizing Peter's email]
   … 2 options: adopt now (will require rejoining), or do nothing
   (wait for 2022)
   … questions?

     [12] https://www.w3.org/2020/11/03-dxwg-minutes

   Andrea: did not get feedback from the Group so far

   Riccardo: we can assume that people would complain if they had
   … can we still do the living standard if we don't switch to new

   plh: yes, but you wouldn't get the RF license

   Riccardo: that's a bummer

   Andrea: what is the impact on the FPWD?

   plh: deadline is November 27

   Andrea: fine to have a resolution now and allow people to
   pushback if they'd like

   Rachel: reviewing the minutes from last minutes. did we check
   with the conneg people?
   … Rob wasn't sure we can make the switch

   Plh: better be safe than sorry here.

   Riccardo: by end of year, we need to publish the FPWD for DCAT

   Plh: don't make that contingent on the patent policy switch

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> The group accepts the inclusion of the new
   patent policy ([13]https://www.w3.org/Consortium/
   Patent-Policy-20200915/) in the DXWG charter

     [13] https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20200915/)

   (draft proposal)

   Andrea: not sure if we can vote for that. we'll need more time

   Riccardo: let's not call the question
   … and we can revisit in 6 months


   <AndreaPerego> +1

   <Rachel> +1

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

   Resolution: the switch to new PP is postponed


   <RiccardoAlbertoni> ( see [14]https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/
   dcat/#dataset-versions, and [15]https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/
   dcat/#dataset-series )

     [14] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dataset-versions,
     [15] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dataset-series

   Riccardo: we have new sections on versioning and dataset series
   … we asked for feedback since mid-October
   … got some
   … we'd like to publish the FPWD for DCAT to collect further
   … no harm in publishing
   … we included issues in the draft as well

   Andrea: new sections are more proposals at this time
   … trying to address all of the issues that have been raised but
   not set in stone
   … we tried to propose solutions
   … it's preliminary work
   … some aspects still need discussion
   … and some are controversial
   … we can revise those sections dramatically in the future
   … approving the publication of the FPWD doesn't make it final

   Rachel: following the comments and should be able to comment in
   the future

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> Proposed: to publish the FPWD for DCAT 3

   <AndreaPerego> +1

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> +1


   <Rachel> +1

   Resolution: to publish the FPWD for DCAT 3

   plh: let's publish on December 8 (unless we get objections on
   the list)
   … will send transition on December 1st
   … and a CfC to the Group this week
   … need the document before end of week of December 4

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> 21:00 UTC + 3h

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> [16]https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/

     [16] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open

   <RiccardoAlbertoni> close action-415

   <trackbot> Closed action-415.

  outstanding actions

   close action-415

   <trackbot> Closed action-415.


   <trackbot> [17]action-435: Andrea Perego to Prepare reply to
   comments in
   6.html -- due 2020-11-18 -- OPEN

     [17] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/435

   close action-435

   <trackbot> Closed action-435.


   <trackbot> [18]action-432: Riccardo Albertoni to Include
   feedback as issues in the dcat spec -- due 2020-10-21 -- OPEN

     [18] https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/432

   close action-432

   <trackbot> Closed action-432.

   Rachel: would like to catch up on DCAT and others
   … what's the best way?

   Andrea: start from the spec itself rather than GH, then look at
   the project issues

   <AndreaPerego> [19]https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects

   Andrea: and feel free to join the DCAT subgroup calls


   <Rachel> bye thanks

   <AndreaPerego> Thanks, and bye

Summary of resolutions

    1. [20]approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2020/
    2. [21]the switch to new PP is postponed
    3. [22]to publish the FPWD for DCAT 3

    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [23]scribe.perl version 124 (Wed Oct 28 18:08:33 2020 UTC).

     [23] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2020 22:00:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 17 November 2020 22:00:43 UTC