- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:18:35 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
+1 for closing. Especially I would add that the starting point of the issue doesn't apply anymore. As hinted in earlier discussions, now DCMI doesn't mandate a formal range of `rdfs:Class` for `dcterms:type`: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#http://purl.org/dc/terms/type -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/314#issuecomment-727604552 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 15 November 2020 17:18:36 UTC