- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:03:52 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@agreiner said > I think both those examples would have happily preferred a dcat:version had it been available, and neither was in a position to mint their own, so it's not surprising that they would use what was available, whether or not it was a strong choice. I don't recall the DWBP rationale behind the decision of using `owl:versionInfo` in examples, but for ADMS the adoption of this property was based on the principle of re-using existing terms, when available. A specific term could have been defined in the ADMS namespace if deemed necessary, as it was done with `adms:versionNotes`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1280#issuecomment-727163806 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2020 08:03:55 UTC