Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280)

@agreiner said

> I think both those examples would have happily preferred a dcat:version had it been available, and neither was in a position to mint their own, so it's not surprising that they would use what was available, whether or not it was a strong choice.

I don't recall the DWBP rationale behind the decision of using `owl:versionInfo` in examples, but for ADMS the adoption of this property was based on the principle of re-using existing terms, when available. A specific term could have been defined in the ADMS namespace if deemed necessary, as it was done with `adms:versionNotes`.

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Saturday, 14 November 2020 08:03:55 UTC