- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 07:53:15 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Original thread started in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275 , following feedback reported in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Oct/0086.html Copying below the comments submitted so far: @agreiner - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issue-741202772 > [...] > > Since schema.org is already supporting version as a term, and it is in some sense a child vocabulary, following what schema is doing would be helpful for compatibility with them. @andrea-perego - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726363227 > @agreiner , [...] > > Could you please elaborate? > > Currently, the versioning section recommends using `owl:versionInfo` to specify the resource identifier. Do you see any issue in re-using this property? @riccardoAlbertoni - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726831135 > [...] > > Just providing more context to the discussion. > We provide an alignment between schema.org and DCAT, see [appendix B](https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-adjustingReferenceToIssues/dcat/index.html#dcat-sdo) in the current FPWD. The alignment was already included in DCAT 2. > > I wonder if we want to keep the same line and add a new line in the mapping for the correspondence between `owl:versionInfo` and `schema:version`. @agreiner - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726423294 > Yes, I think owl:versionInfo is meant to describe versions of ontology terms and constructs specifically. @riccardoAlbertoni - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726831135 > [...] > > Yes, it is mainly for ontology terms, but using it for datasets is a common practice. > For example, owl:versionInfo is one of the implementation examples considered in the "Data Web Best Practice 7: Provide a version indicator" https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#dataVersioning. Examples in the DWBP Rec have not normative status. Nevertheless, they should still suggest proper ways to implement Best Practices. > Similarly, it is reused by ADMS (see https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#owl-versioninfo). @agreiner - https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-727094882 > I think both those examples would have happily preferred a dcat:version had it been available, and neither was in a position to mint their own, so it's not surprising that they would use what was available, whether or not it was a strong choice. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1280#issuecomment-727162776 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2020 07:53:18 UTC