- From: Annette Greiner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:20:58 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Yes, I think owl:versionInfo is meant to describe versions of ontology terms and constructs specifically. > On Nov 12, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Andrea Perego <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > > @agreiner <https://github.com/agreiner> , about this point: > > Since schema.org is already supporting version as a term, and it is in some sense a child vocabulary, following what schema is doing would be helpful for compatibility with them. > > Could you please elaborate? > > Currently, the versioning section recommends using owl:versionInfo to specify the resource identifier. Do you see any issue in re-using this property? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726363227>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGVLN23FA7V5MKSBEHMXVDSPRKP3ANCNFSM4TSV5TIA>. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1275#issuecomment-726423294 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 00:21:00 UTC