- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:46:25 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
riccardoAlbertoni has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? == Besides the human-readable descriptions of the changes of version #89, we might want to discuss suggestions on also considering more machine-friendly references. See below: >What about a pointer to a Git transaction? _Originally posted by @nicholascar in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/89#issuecomment-368896015_ >I quite like the idea of a Git transaction but not all new versions would naturally be picked up that way, I think. For those that do, then perhaps we should encourage it An example where the textual approach works better would be where a publisher has changed coverage in some way, but the rest stays the same. [This is fairly common practice with financial data - I may have a dataset that claims to cover corporates across the EU for example but has systematic issues for the UK (for example). When I address those issues, I may want to treat it as a new version of the original dataset rather than a new dataset as a way of signaling to users that its an important change but still an evolution of what I produced before] This is all information domain-specific, of course. _Originally posted by @davebrowning in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/89#issuecomment-368914163_ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1271 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2020 22:46:27 UTC