- From: pwin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 08:47:59 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree with Simon I see dcat as more about a catalog than about the nature of what is being catalogued. There's discovery metadata and conformity constraints (again, to help with subsetting or accurate placement of the catalog contents in mind) in the model, and this is all about cataloguing. On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, 09:41 Simon Cox, <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @kcoyle <https://github.com/kcoyle> not sure I agree. A sub-class of > dcat:Resource for real-world things (for example, ex:Specimen) might add > additional descriptors related to things - e.g. physical dimensions. In > fact the individual record of type ex:Specimen might serve as *the* > landing page for something that has no other digital or web presence. In > this way, a museum catalog (for example) could modeled on the DCAT catalog > - not a dataset-catalog of course, but a specimen-catalog. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1221#issuecomment-605604320>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIFYTGYU6AZ7SWDNXAGYA3RJ4CUXANCNFSM4LBF76AA> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by pwin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1221#issuecomment-605604923 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 29 March 2020 08:48:01 UTC