- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:59:48 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
riccardoAlbertoni has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Axiom binding the properties dcat:servesDataset and dcat:accessService == Considering together with @aisaac the following example, we were wondering if we need an axiom binding the properties `dcat:servesDataset` and `dcat:accessService`. Are there any cases in which having a distribution `:myDatasetDistribution` with access service `:mySparqlService` does not imply the service also serves `:myDataset`? ``` :myDataset a dcat:Dataset ; dcat:distribution :myDatasetDistribution . :myDatasetlDistribution a dcat:Distribution ; dcat:accessService :mySparqlService . :mySparqlService a dcat:DataService ; dcterms:conformsTo <https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/>; dcat:endpointURL <http://myendpoint.org/sparql> ; dcat:servesDataset :myDataset . ``` If there aren't, we might want to model this, for example with an axiom similar to the following ``` InverseObjectProperties( dcat:servesDataset ObjectPropertyChain(dcat:distribution dcat:accessService) ) . ``` Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1227 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2020 15:59:49 UTC