- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:42:08 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@bertvannuffelen > ... somewhere somebody created a catalogue of e.g. vehicles using dcat:Dataset, that DCAT must accept this as a good and desired practice. I hope that a vocabulary community has the freedom to state about implementations that the application of the vocabulary is not as intended. But now you are arguing for this working group to take on the role of Dataset Police! I don't think that we as a group are in the business of declaring good or bad practices -- we're in the business of defining a vocabulary that we think is useful for the description of all kinds of data catalogues. I quite like @dr-shorthair's proposal which leaves it really to the user to decide. If they think DCAT meets their needs, please let them use it -- if not, they can define something else, either as an extension of DCAT by creating a local subclass of `dcat:Resource`, or by creating their own vocabulary outside of it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1221#issuecomment-595904890 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 6 March 2020 18:42:09 UTC