- From: Jakub Klímek via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 19:03:52 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@andrea-perego What is the benefit of describing this case (and similar cases) as one service with multiple endpoints as opposed to multiple services? > geospatial "view" service (i.e., a service portraying data on a map) with 2 endpoints, both serving the same dataset, but using different protocols (WMS and ArcGIS REST) Why is this one service and not two services? What makes the identity of a service? Creating two ways of describing this makes it again harder for consumers of such metadata to work with it - more possibilities = harder to work with. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakubklimek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1242#issuecomment-647167804 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2020 19:03:54 UTC