- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 23:27:43 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
If ADMS is useful, its non-normative status is an issue - then this is already addressed by the fact ADMS is a profile of DCAT. It can be dealt with as a suggested profile recommendation. What is really achieved by duplication other than potential confusion? Alignments are good - except there is no explicit behaviour requiring them to be used in a particular way. If you have an alignment, but its in a separate resource, then what would that mean for any statement about conformance to ADMS? How could a user discover that ADMS conformance is available via some inferencing entailment regime using the alignment? Making it normative is best achieved as a matter of changing the status of ADMS. i think the alternative is to define the ways alignments are used in conformance declarations and determination. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1238#issuecomment-638512950 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2020 23:27:45 UTC