- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:54:44 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@dr-shorthair re. dcta:accessService, we're adding it to the pattern, but the people we work with may not implement it and we will not require it (i.e. only note it's recommended), because it's only a SHOULD - and it's not needed for our requirements. Is it ok? About extra PROV types, in fact I think none of that PROV typing is required. It's completely superfluous, as the types can be infered from PROV domain and ranges. These domain and ranges don't actually *require* the types to be present... So I would be in favor of removing everything :-) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1230#issuecomment-662893903 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2020 08:54:46 UTC