@dr-shorthair re. dcta:accessService, we're adding it to the pattern, but the people we work with may not implement it and we will not require it (i.e. only note it's recommended), because it's only a SHOULD - and it's not needed for our requirements. Is it ok? About extra PROV types, in fact I think none of that PROV typing is required. It's completely superfluous, as the types can be infered from PROV domain and ranges. These domain and ranges don't actually *require* the types to be present... So I would be in favor of removing everything :-) -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1230#issuecomment-662893903 using your GitHub accountReceived on Thursday, 23 July 2020 08:54:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:35 UTC