- From: Karen Coyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:59:32 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo What does matter is not to change the semantics of the dct:conformsTo, since that is defined by DCMI. If you need different semantics then you need a different property. So, yes, it does matter that it is a 'standard' although the interpretation of 'established standard' is somewhat loose. I would say that using dct:conformsTo to link from a dataset to a specific processing program or internal schema is more than a stretch, and doesn't help the client select an application vs a defined standard. Obviously there are no Dublin Core Cops to stop you, but you may not be communicating well outside of your own narrow community if you use dct:conformsTo with two very different meanings. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1211#issuecomment-589226744 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2020 17:59:34 UTC