Friday, 28 February 2020
Thursday, 27 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiaton: profile token in Accept-Profile header (#1219)
- [dxwg] Profile negotiaton: profile token in Accept-Profile header (#1219)
Wednesday, 26 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Removal of ConnegP & PROF from DCAT repo
Tuesday, 25 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Resource Descriptor -> Profile Resource (#1109)
- dxwg-ACTION-399: Mail the group with a proposal to move the prof and connegp drafts from the original repo to the new ones
- dxwg-ACTION-398: Keep an eye on #1211 as a shared issue
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Sunday, 23 February 2020
Friday, 21 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Thursday, 20 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Auto-managed GitHub teams
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Cheka: A profile hierarchy-based RDF graph validation tool written in Python
Wednesday, 19 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Tuesday, 18 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: DXWG Plenary 2020-02-18T21:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
Monday, 17 February 2020
Thursday, 13 February 2020
Wednesday, 12 February 2020
Tuesday, 11 February 2020
- dxwg-ACTION-397: Initiate contact with rda
- dxwg-ACTION-396: Set up poll about trying split
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
Monday, 10 February 2020
Saturday, 8 February 2020
- Dataset Exchange Working Group Charter Approved; Call for Participation
- [dxwg] Add Appendix numbering requirements per Profile to ConnegP (#1218)
Friday, 7 February 2020
Thursday, 6 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone
- Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone
- Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone
- Re: DCAT3 FPWD milestone
- DXWG Plenary 2020-02-11T21:00:00
- [dxwg] Add hyperlink to RDF Property in property tables (#1217)
Wednesday, 5 February 2020
- Re: [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
- [dxwg] Should we split the DXWG GitHub Repo? (#1216)
Tuesday, 4 February 2020
- Comments sought on The Profiles Vocabulary, W3C WG Note
- DCAT3 FPWD milestone
- dxwg-ACTION-395: Create a github issue for repo splitting
- dxwg-ACTION-394: Email wg about dcat3 milestone 1
- dxwg-ACTION-393: Report back to plenary about prof on 11th feb
- dxwg-ACTION-392: Report conformance testing to plenary 11th feb
- DCAT2 REC publicity
- dxwg-ACTION-391: Contact all wg to use the dcat contacts spreadsheet
- Closed: [dxwg] no content-type charset value in header of https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl (#1183)
- Closed: [dxwg] Content negotiation for http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat# (#1196)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Content negotiation for http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat# (#1196)
- Aw: DCAT Version 2 Published Today
- DCAT Version 2 Published Today
Monday, 3 February 2020
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Closed: [dxwg] (dcat) Support the content negotiation for ld+json (#1215)
- Re: [dxwg] (dcat) Support the content negotiation for ld+json (#1215)
- Re: [dxwg] (dcat) Support the content negotiation for ld+json (#1215)
- Re: DXWG Plenary 2020-02-04T21:00:00
- Re: [dxwg] Upstreaming tweaks applied to the REC (#1214)