W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2020

Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:07:19 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-607001172-1585710438-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> Today, I had the use of UML notation in that diagram quoted to me as justifying assuming OOP semantics.

Did you point to the NOTE: ? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1228#issuecomment-607001172 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2020 03:07:21 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Matthew Rawlings via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)"
Previous message: Matthew Rawlings via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)"
Maybe in reply to: Matthew Rawlings via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)"
Next in thread: Matthew Rawlings via GitHub: "Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:34 UTC