W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2020

Re: [dxwg] Inheritance terminology not appropriate for RDFS and OWL (#1228)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 00:53:47 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-606964235-1585702426-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
OK @rawmatt you are a good standards lawyer ;-) I've done a bit of that myself so can recognise and respect the argument. However, I was actually thinking that it might be useful to mention this argument in the (non-normative) note below the caption to this figure: 
which explains that the summary diagram is not UML. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1228#issuecomment-606964235 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2020 00:53:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:34 UTC