W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Clarify need for unambiguous profile URIs when compound specifications referenced. (#1017)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 08:29:41 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-515666659-1564216179-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@kcoyle  +1 to  "such that IF you wish certain functionality then you MUST provide a "hook" (URI) into the description that supports that functionality."

I'm not sure the second sentence is clear enough though - it sounds as though content negotiation might apply to the document /specification/portion itself - not to the set of data instances described by it, which is the real functionality described by conneg..


GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1017#issuecomment-515666659 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2019 08:29:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC