W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Addressing issue #725 (#1010)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:46:30 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-514520124-1563954388-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The following properties are recommended for use in the context of more than one DCAT class. 

- dct:conformsTo - dcat:CatalogRecord, dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:description - dcat:CatalogRecord, dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:issued - dcat:CatalogRecord, dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:modified - dcat:CatalogRecord, dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:title - dcat:CatalogRecord, dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:accessRights - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:issued - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:license - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:modified - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dct:rights - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- odrl:hasPolicy - dcat:Resource, dcat:Distribution
- dcat:spatialResolutionInMeters - dcat:Dataset, dcat:Distribution
- dcat:temporalResolution - dcat:Dataset, dcat:Distribution

In some cases the definition or usage note is different in the separate contexts. 
Perhaps these should also be distinguished in dcat.ttl with a prefix 'In the context of a DCAT 2.0 {classname},' ?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1010#issuecomment-514520124 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2019 07:46:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:55 UTC