- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 03:56:00 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
> there is no machine readable way to distinguish, which annotation goes with which usage of the property, creating mess.
@jakubklimek you have a good point here. There are a small number of cases where the usage guideline is different depending on context, even within DCAT.
Yes, the [web-annotation vocabulary](https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/) might provide a platform - I've just skimmed it and can see the general intention. It might be interesting to develop some patterns relating to our use case here - perhaps you could propose something. This could contribute to implementation of the more general 'profile' case mentioned by @kcoyle. Mind you, OA appears to be mostly aimed at applications to annotate text-ish resources, and I'm not sure if users who loaded dcat.ttl would find or notice annotations nested in this way.
In the short term, perhaps we could provide some assistance to users by inserting the phrase "In the context of a DCAT {classname}, ..." at the beginning of each textual definition or scope note.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/725#issuecomment-513630977 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 22 July 2019 03:56:01 UTC