Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)

@makxdekkers I was responsible for that. 
Yes, a URI is always preferable, though `dct:type` is a `rdf:Property` so a literal is allowed. 

There are a lot of options that might be OK 

1. http://www.opengis.net/def/observationType/OGC-OM/2.0/OM_Observation
2. http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/Observation 
3. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BCO_0000003 
4. http://dbpedia.org/resource/Observation

Which would you prefer? Note that 2. and 3. are formal OWL Classes, so probably should be the value of rdf:type rather than dct:type. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1007#issuecomment-513312597 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 19 July 2019 17:33:15 UTC