W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] PR addressing issue958 (#1007)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:33:11 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-513312597-1563557589-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@makxdekkers I was responsible for that. 
Yes, a URI is always preferable, though `dct:type` is a `rdf:Property` so a literal is allowed. 

There are a lot of options that might be OK 

1. http://www.opengis.net/def/observationType/OGC-OM/2.0/OM_Observation
2. http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/Observation 
3. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BCO_0000003 
4. http://dbpedia.org/resource/Observation

Which would you prefer? Note that 2. and 3. are formal OWL Classes, so probably should be the value of rdf:type rather than dct:type. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1007#issuecomment-513312597 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 19 July 2019 17:33:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC