- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:30:05 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I agree that we should let the users decide between soft- and hard- typing or even both. IMO the following @dr-shorthair's proposal is a more direct formulation than the previous > ``` > It is strongly recommended to use a more specific sub-class. When describing a > resource which is not a dcat:Dataset or dcat:DataService, it is recommended to create a > suitable sub-class of dcat:Resource, or use dcat:Resource with the dct:type property to > indicate the specific type. > ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/980#issuecomment-511995281 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2019 21:30:06 UTC