W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:16:19 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-511075088-1562980578-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Thats not the point at all. Its the "context" that must be consistent with the base specification. Of course context is an undefined term introduced by this definition but i am happy enough with it, except that other people dont seem to understand that its the important part of the functional requirements for profiles.. i dont think "conformance target" is great.. but at least it highlights its an important concept.

Also its a syllogism to impute that what can be inferred from an instance because of the definition of the class is not about that definition... 

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-511075088 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2019 01:16:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC