- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:20:04 +0200
- To: public-dxwg-wg <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
On Tuesday's call, we resolved [1]: RESOLVED: to defer discussion of the UC and focus on definitions of profile as the[y] *are now* for the conneg and dcat docs. We are hitting the pause button on trying to define profiles as they think they _could_ or _should_ be in the future (e.g., "sets of constraints"). "Profile" must be defined in CONNEG and DCAT in ways that recognizably fit what CONNEG and DCAT are about. As Peter has suggested, the definitions must be comprehensible to ordinary readers outside of this group. I have proposed two simple definitions, which have gone through several iterations [2,3,4,5]. Taking on board Stephen's reduced proposal, we end up with: data profile A data specification that constrains, extends, or annotates other data specifications. data specification A specification, with human- and/or machine-processable representations, that defines the content and structure of data used in a given context. As per Antoine's concerns about the ambiguity of "annotates" [6], I suggest we add something like: "In this context, 'annotate' means 'to provide guidance or explanation about usage'." By my count, circa eight out of the eleven active members in this discussion have expressed support for these definitions (or a variant thereof), either by upvoting in Github or by commenting on calls. I agree with Antoine [7] that the definition of "profile" should acknowledge and cite two other usages of "profile" in a data context -- JSON-LD "profiles" ("syntactic profiles") and "data profiling" (a data analysis activity) -- if only to say that they are out of scope. Could we please bring this to a vote? Tom [1] https://www.w3.org/2019/07/09-dxwg-minutes#x04 [2] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-506650168 [3] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507129887 [4] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507780038 [5] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507833126 [6] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507851591 [7] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/976 -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2019 09:20:32 UTC