Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

>  but rather about having human- or machine-readable representations

+1 to representations, without saying more about what they are or their relation (could be from a single SHACL or ShEx document; could be separate). 

? Do we exclude profiles without one or the other? Can we say "may have" to be inclusive?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507772666 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2019 17:28:27 UTC