W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:43:31 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-507756257-1562085809-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@tombaker this is better but I'm still hesitant - it depends on the final wording. I see the specification as something conceptual, a "hub" between representations/documents, so I'd prefer something that hints that a data specification *has* a family of representations, rather than *is* a family of representation (even though of course the representations are an essential part of the data specification). Similarly for your definition data profile, for me it's not about being human- or machine-readable, but rather about having human- or machine-readable representations (and btw I guess in Guidance we should say that there must be some human-readable representation, even partial, otherwise it's a strange spec...)

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507756257 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2019 16:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC