Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

@smrgeoinfo I think that software development should be a (perhaps significantly increasing) subset of the use cases for a 'profile'.  This is why I think we need to be inclusive in our definition, but quickly move to some broad taxonomy of profile types that can then permit development of good practice documentation.  There might also be a migration path that could be suggested between things which at present require quite a bit of human in the loop to other processes that make much more machine use.  There are many examples of maturity model that we might use for this - here I'm thinking about interoperability maturity models as referenced in https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/isa/files/actions/2016.37_en.pdf and interoperability reference architectures as described in  https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/solutions/eira_en 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by pwin
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507413527 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 1 July 2019 20:29:06 UTC